[15] RFR(T) 8242357: [JVMCI] Incorrect use of JVMCI_CHECK_ on return statement
Vladimir Kozlov
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Sat Apr 18 00:43:01 UTC 2020
Thank you, Xin
Vladimir K
On 4/17/20 5:36 PM, Liu, Xin wrote:
> LGTM. I used to backport a similar change (exceptions.hpp) to jdk8u.
> I also use regex to scan the whole source code, I think it’s the only place in hotspot.
>
> Thanks,
> --lx
>
> On 4/17/20, 5:02 PM, "hotspot-compiler-dev on behalf of Vladimir Kozlov" <hotspot-compiler-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242357
>
> CHECK macros can't be used on a return statement - they expand to include code after the return [2] and so have no affect.
>
> Fix:
>
> src/hotspot/share/jvmci/jvmciEnv.hpp
> @@ -262,7 +262,8 @@
> char* as_utf8_string(JVMCIObject str, char* buf, int buflen);
>
> JVMCIObject create_string(Symbol* str, JVMCI_TRAPS) {
> - return create_string(str->as_C_string(), JVMCI_CHECK_(JVMCIObject()));
> + JVMCIObject s = create_string(str->as_C_string(), JVMCI_CHECK_(JVMCIObject()));
> + return s;
> }
>
> I tried to find similar cases but it was the only one.
> Clang -Wunreachable-code-aggressive does not catch this case.
>
> Tested hs-tier1,hs-tier3-graal
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/90882ba9f488/src/hotspot/share/jvmci/jvmciExceptions.hpp#l48
>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list