RFR: JDK-8258603 c1 IR::verify is expensive [v5]
Ludvig Janiuk
duke at openjdk.java.net
Mon Dec 20 08:59:26 UTC 2021
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:07:43 GMT, Albert Mingkun Yang <ayang at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Ludvig Janiuk has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> flip ifs
>
> I wonder if "map fusion" works here, as in improving the perf of verification.
>
> Using `IR::verify_local` as an example:
>
>
> {
> VerifyClosure cl;
> blocks.iterate_forward(&cl);
> }
>
> class VerifyClosure : public BlockClosure {
>
> void block_do(BlockBegin* block) override {
> verify_end_not_null(block);
>
> verify_edge_mutuality(block);
>
> verify_block_begin_field(block);
>
> // more verifier
> }
> }
>
>
> This should cut down #iteration to 1.
@albertnetymk It would work for almost all of the verifiers, but there is a tradeoff with code flexibility. I'd opt to leave as-is.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6850
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list