RFR: 8320448: Accelerate IndexOf using AVX2 [v49]
Emanuel Peter
epeter at openjdk.org
Thu May 30 13:59:18 UTC 2024
On Thu, 30 May 2024 13:19:57 GMT, Scott Gibbons <sgibbons at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Re-write the IndexOf code without the use of the pcmpestri instruction, only using AVX2 instructions. This change accelerates String.IndexOf on average 1.3x for AVX2. The benchmark numbers:
>>
>>
>> Benchmark Score Latest
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithMediumSub 343.573 317.934 0.925375393x
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub1 1039.081 1053.96 1.014319384x
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub2 55.828 110.541 1.980027943x
>> StringIndexOf.constantPattern 9.361 11.906 1.271872663x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharLongSuccess 4.216 4.218 1.000474383x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharMediumSuccess 3.133 3.216 1.02649218x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharShortSuccess 3.76 3.761 1.000265957x
>> StringIndexOf.success 9.186 9.713 1.057369911x
>> StringIndexOf.successBig 14.341 46.343 3.231504079x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_String 6220.918 12154.52 1.953814533x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_char 5503.556 5540.044 1.006629895x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_String 6978.854 6818.689 0.977049957x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_char 5657.499 5474.624 0.967675646x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_String 7132.541 6863.359 0.962260014x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_char 16013.389 16162.437 1.009307711x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_String 7386.123 14771.622 1.999915517x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_char 9901.671 9782.245 0.987938803
>
> Scott Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Stupid EOL at end
> - Add @test block; fix test indentation
test/jdk/java/lang/String/IndexOf.java line 25:
> 23:
> 24: /*
> 25: * @test
You should add the `@bug 8320448` for all runs.
test/jdk/java/lang/String/IndexOf.java line 27:
> 25: * @test
> 26: * @summary test String indexOf() intrinsic
> 27: * @run main/othervm IndexOf
Suggestion:
* @run main IndexOf
You do not need a new VM if you have no arguments ;)
test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/ECoreIndexOf.java line 25:
> 23:
> 24: /* @test
> 25: * @bug 4162796 4162796
You need to fix the bug numbers.
test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/ECoreIndexOf.java line 27:
> 25: * @bug 4162796 4162796
> 26: * @summary Test indexOf and lastIndexOf
> 27: * @run main/othervm -Xbatch -XX:-TieredCompilation -XX:CompileCommand=dontinline,ECoreIndexOf.indexOfKernel ECoreIndexOf
I would also add a line without `-XX:-TieredCompilation`, then C1 can be tested with this too
test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/ECoreIndexOf.java line 32:
> 30:
> 31: /* @test
> 32: * @bug 4162796 4162796
Here too
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620760730
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620756896
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620753321
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620754948
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620753577
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list