RFR: 8338971: IGV: Add incrementally inlined method name to phase name [v2]

[Christian Hagedorn]

> This patch adds the method name to the incremental inlining step dumps in IGV which improves debugging issues involving incremental inlining:
> 
> 
> static void test() {
>     method1();
>     method2();
>     method3();
> }
> 
> static void method1() {}
> static void method2() {}
> static void method3() {}
> 
> Run with `-XX:+AlwaysIncrementalInline` and IGV print level >=3:
> 
> Before patch:
> ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a3a1ab32-e7b3-4ccb-8ab2-a75d2b5b6912)
> 
> After patch:
> ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8100a2fe-1670-4687-b8b8-c8053fbaa7d7)
> 
> The patch just prints the method name if we call `print_method()` with `n` being a call node which, AFAICT, only happens for the incremental inlining step. However, even if we call it with another phase at some point, I don't think it hurts to also dump the method name there.
> 
> #### Testing
> - Manually verifying change in IGV
> - Building IGV which runs its unit tests
> - Sanity run with a hello world program with `-Xcomp -XX:+AlwaysIncrementalInline -XX:+PrintIdealGraph -XX:PrintIdealGraphLevel=3 -XX:PrintIdealGraphFile=graph.xml`
> 
> Thanks,
> Christian

Christian Hagedorn has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  suggestion

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20834/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20834/files/24cefa31..dc0f25a4

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=20834&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=20834&range=00-01

  Stats: 11 lines in 1 file changed: 6 ins; 0 del; 5 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20834.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20834/head:pull/20834

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20834