RFR (S): 8230854: Cleanup SuppressWarnings in test lib and remove noisy traces in StreamPumper
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Fri Sep 13 09:17:08 UTC 2019
Hi Christoph,
Update looks good.
I assume you've tested by building with javac (and Eclipse!) with
-Xlint:all ? :)
Thanks,
David
On 13/09/2019 6:04 pm, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>>>> test/lib/jdk/test/lib/process/ProcessTools.java
>>>>
>>>> - @SuppressWarnings("overloads")
>>>> public static Process startProcess(String name,
>>>> ProcessBuilder processBuilder,
>>>> final Predicate<String>
>>>> linePredicate)
>>>>
>>>> Unnecessary? I can't find what this warning is supposed to mean. Is it used by some IDE's?
>>> I didn't find any reference either and the IDE says that this is an unknown
>> annotation. So unless somebody steps up and tells us what it's good for, I guess it can be removed.
>>
>> Not it is a valid warning. Try compiling with -Xlint:all without the
>> warning suppressed:
>>
>> ----------System.err:(19/1295)----------
>> /scratch/users/daholme/jdk-
>> dev2/open/test/lib/jdk/test/lib/process/ProcessTools.java:91:
>> warning: [overloads]
>> startProcess(String,ProcessBuilder,Consumer<String>) in ProcessTools is
>> potentially ambiguous with
>> startProcess(String,ProcessBuilder,Predicate<String>) in ProcessTools
>> public static Process startProcess(String name,
>> ^
>
> Thanks for taking a closer look here and enlightening me.
>
> @SuppressWarnings("overloads") is supported by javac but not by my Eclipse IDE. One can list supported @SuppressWarnings types with javac -X. You'll get:
> overloads Warn about issues regarding method overloads.
>
> So I now understand what the warning means and why @SuppressWarnings("overloads") is required here. I've also configured my Eclipse to ignore this unknown annotation.
>
> New webrev, keeping @SuppressWarnings("overloads"): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8230854.1/
>
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list