RFR: 8305509: C1 fails "assert(k != nullptr) failed: illegal use of unloaded klass"
Coleen Phillimore
coleenp at openjdk.org
Tue Apr 4 16:10:13 UTC 2023
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:03:11 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcubed at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I tested the fix for JDK-8304743 on tier1-8, then did this refactoring which required a ciKlass::get_Klass() call that failed. This fix reverts the refactoring.
>>
>> Here was the commit for JDK-8304743: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b062b1bd8126610d9288dc179d69e54a40b81015
>>
>> I added the HandleMark to the utility function. It wasn't there in the original code.
>>
>> Tested with tier4.
>
> I agree that this this patch is a clean reversion of the refactoring
> changes made in the https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13270 PR.
> So this work returns the state of this patch to where you did Mach5
> Tier[1-8] testing.
>
> You didn't declare this fix to be trivial, but I consider this to be a
> trivial [BACKOUT] of a portion of the fix for:
>
> [JDK-8304743](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8304743) Compile_lock and SystemDictionary updates
@dcubed-ojdk Thank you Dan for reviewing.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13327#issuecomment-1496240382
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list