RFR: JDK-8331732 : [PPC64] Unify and optimize code which converts != 0 to 1 [v2]

Amit Kumar amitkumar at openjdk.org
Wed Jun 26 17:01:15 UTC 2024


On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:45:25 GMT, Suchismith Roy <sroy at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> [JDK-8331732](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331732)
>> The template interpreter contains branch-free conversion code for T_BOOLEAN (TemplateInterpreterGenerator::generate_result_handler_for).
>> 
>> SharedRuntime::generate_native_wrapper uses unoptimized code to "Unpack the native result" for T_BOOLEAN.
>> Power10 has the "setbc" / "setbcr" instruction.
>> 
>> A new function has been created for the conversion and use "setbcr" on Power10 (determined by VM_Version::has_brw()) and otherwise the branch-free implementation. We should have a function for 32 and one for 64 bit operations (or one with supports both).
>> 
>> The new code for MacroAssembler::verify_secondary_supers_table  also uses the new function.
>
> Suchismith Roy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   empty lines

src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/macroAssembler_ppc.cpp line 349:

> 347: // Set register dst to true if dst is non zero using temp for calculations on Power Version<10.
> 348: // Set register dst to true if dst is non zero for Power 10 and above machines.
> 349: void MacroAssembler::normalize_bool(Register dst, Register temp, bool use_64bit) {

I would've used `is_64bit/is_long` instead of `use_64bit`. But that's personal choice and leave it upto you.

src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/macroAssembler_ppc.cpp line 356:

> 354:     else
> 355:       cmpwi(CCR0, dst, 0);
> 356:     setbcr(dst, CCR0, Assembler::zero);

This is what I understood after implementation & definition: 

If bit BI of the CR contains a 1, register RT is set to 0. Otherwise, register RT is set to 1.

CCR0 will contain `1` when `dst == 0`. then  `dst` will be set to `1` by `setbcr`.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19886#discussion_r1655235075
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19886#discussion_r1655232478


More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list