RFR: 8347719: [REDO] Portable implementation of FORBID_C_FUNCTION and ALLOW_C_FUNCTION [v2]
Kim Barrett
kbarrett at openjdk.org
Wed Apr 16 13:08:41 UTC 2025
> Please review this second attempt. It's mostly similar to the original
> attempt:
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313396
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22890
> but improves the workarounds for one clang issue, and adds a workaround for
> another clang issue
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347649
>
> See globalDefinitions_gcc.hpp for more details about those issues and the
> workarounds.
>
> Additions to the testing done for the earlier attempt (see below)
>
> mach5 tier4-5. There is an Oracle-internal build configuration in tier5 that
> failed with the earlier attempt.
>
> Local manual build and tier1 test on linux with clang.
> For testing on linux with clang, be aware of these issues:
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8354316
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8354467
>
> Below is a repeat of the PR summary for the earlier attempt.
>
> ----------
>
> Please review this change to how HotSpot prevents the use of certain C library
> functions (e.g. poisons references to those functions), while permitting a
> subset to be used in restricted circumstances. Reasons for poisoning a
> function include it being considered obsolete, or a security concern, or there
> is a HotSpot function (typically in the os:: namespace) providing similar
> functionality that should be used instead.
>
> The old mechanism, based on -Wattribute-warning and the associated attribute,
> only worked for gcc. (Clang's implementation differs in an important way from
> gcc, which is the subject of a clang bug that has been open for years. MSVC
> doesn't provide a similar mechanism.) It also had problems with LTO, due to a
> gcc bug.
>
> The new mechanism is based on deprecation warnings, using [[deprecated]]
> attributes. We redeclare or forward declare the functions we want to prevent
> use of as being deprecated. This relies on deprecation warnings being
> enabled, which they already are in our build configuration. All of our
> supported compilers support the [[deprecated]] attribute.
>
> Another benefit of using deprecation warnings rather than warning attributes
> is the time when the check is performed. Warning attributes are checked only
> if the function is referenced after all optimizations have been performed.
> Deprecation is checked during initial semantic analysis. That's better for
> our purposes here. (This is also part of why gcc LTO has problems with the
> old mechanism, but not the new.)
>
> Adding these redeclarations or forward declarations isn't as simple as
> expected, due to differences between the various compilers. We hide t...
Kim Barrett has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:
- Merge branch 'master' into redo-poisoning
- note that clang bug with deprecated attribute has been fixed
- improve/add clang-specific workarounds
- apply original change
-------------
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24608/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24608/files/ae4f67f7..ed63515b
Webrevs:
- full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=24608&range=01
- incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=24608&range=00-01
Stats: 176886 lines in 280 files changed: 8193 ins; 167956 del; 737 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24608.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24608/head:pull/24608
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24608
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list