CMS parallel initial mark

[Hiroshi Yamauchi]

>  - I think Jon already mentioned that it might be better to use an int
> for worker_id in CMSParMarkTask::do_young_space_rescan() (if it is
> actually needed) to keep that code in line with current use.
>

I thought there was a mass conversion from "work(int i)" to "work(uint
worker_id)" around Hotspot 24 or so. Given that understanding, this sounds
like going backwards from uint to int. Am I misunderstanding?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20130607/4eed712b/attachment.htm>