RFR (S): 8010294: Refactor HeapInspection to make it more reusable

[Erik Helin]

Bengt,

On 03/25/2013 11:58 AM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> Changes look good!
>
> One minor nit. I think the test contains the wrong bug number:
>
> * @bug 8004924

Agree, I will fix.

Thanks,
Erik

> Bengt
>
> On 3/25/13 9:32 AM, Erik Helin wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I have updated the change based on internal feedback.
>>
>> The changes between webrev.00 and webrev.01 are mostly in the test code:
>> - The test uses correct @summary description
>> - The test now uses the correct command line flags
>> - The test is more documented to describe how the test code is run
>>
>> There is also a very minor change in the hotspot code. I am now using
>> the operator != instead of operator > when comparing the missed count.
>> This was done just to make the diff one line smaller :)
>>
>> Please see new webrev at:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ehelin/8010294/webrev.01/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Erik
>>
>> On 03/22/2013 10:06 AM, Erik Helin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have refactored the HeapInspection class to prepare for the
>>> vm/gc/detailed/object_count_after_gc event.
>>>
>>> The refactoring mainly consists of breaking up the rather long
>>> heap_inspect function to multiple small functions that can be reused.
>>>
>>> I also moved the public enums used to initialize KlassInfoTable and
>>> KlassInfoHisto to private constants. Now they no longer have to be
>>> passed as an argument to the constructor.
>>>
>>> I also added a test to ensure that my refactoring did not break anything
>>> (the test is not that extensive but at least it ensures that the basic
>>> stuff is working).
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ehelin/8010294/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Bug:
>>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8010294
>>>
>>> Testing:
>>> - JPRT
>>> - A new jtreg test (see webrev)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Erik
>>
>
>