RFR (XS): 8033443: Test8000311 fails after latest changes to parallelize string and symbol table unlink

[Jesper Wilhelmsson]

Looks good.
Ship it!
/Jesper

Thomas Schatzl skrev 3/2/14 5:04 PM:
> Hi all,
>
>    can I have reviews for the following change? It fixes the check that
> verify the correct amount of processed entries during string/symbol
> table unlink.
>
> The change adds an exception for the non-parallel case (i.e. the checks
> will always succeed in that case).
>
> The alternative would be to make the non-parallel case to also "claim"
> work, and use the parallel code. That would require somewhat larger
> refactoring of the string/symbol table code. In that case it would also
> be nice if the string/symbol table iteration did the same. I.e. it seems
> a good enough fix for now.
>
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8033443/webrev/
>
> CR:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033443
>
> Testing:
> jprt, jtreg (all gc tests)
>
> Thomas
>