RFR(s): 8151283: Implement setting jtreg @requires property vm.isG1Supported.

[Dmitry Fazunenko]

On 21.06.2016 15:00, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:53 +0300, Dmitry Fazunenko wrote:
>> Igor, Thomas
>>
>> Thanks for the comments:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfazunen/8151283/webrev.03/
>>
>> Because the change is small, I do not publish the diff between
>> version.
>>
>    could you comment on what you changed?

Sorry,
a added a note about

36 # Note: compiled bootlibs code will be located in the folder 
'bootClasses'

And removed unused WB field.

Thanks,
Dima


>
>> Thanks,
>> Dima
>>
>> On 21.06.2016 13:34, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 00:29 +0300, Dmitry Fazunenko wrote:
>>>> Igor,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for the review!
>>>>
>>>> On 20.06.2016 23:35, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>>>> Dima,
>>>>>
>>>>> the fix looks good to me, thanks for implementing that. I have
>>>>> a
>>>>> question about -Xbootclasspath/a:bootClasses, is it required? I
>>>>> thought classes from requires.extraPropDefns.bootlibs will be
>>>>> added
>>>>> to BCP by jtreg.
>>>>    
>>>> Yes, it's required. We might decided for example to use
>>>> -Xbootclasspath/p:  instead.
>>>> bootClasses - is the name of the local folder (under scratch dir)
>>>> where  classes from the 'requires.extraPropDefns.bootlibs' will
>>>> be
>>>> compiled to.
>>>>
>>>> And I haven't mentioned, that I introduced a field, which is
>>>> currently unused:
>>>>
>>>>         private static final WhiteBox WB = WhiteBox.getWhiteBox();
>>>>
>>>> This is for the simplification of use in the future.
>>>     thanks for clarifying this - I asked myselves for the reason of
>>> that
>>> option too.
>>>
>>> I would prefer to have unused code in the change at hand unless
>>> unavoidable.
> ... and I forgot a "not" here.
>
> I would prefer to not have completely unused code added to a change. If
> it is required for some further change, there should be no problem
> adding it there.
>
> Thanks,
>    Thomas
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20160621/b87c34f3/attachment.htm>