Request for review JDK-8165674 - G1CMMarkStack::out_of_memory possibly redundant

[Alexander Harlap]

Hi Kim,

How about:

"Mark stack should be empty (unless it has overflown)"

Alex


On 3/7/2017 3:05 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Alexander Harlap <alexander.harlap at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Happy to get  review.
>>
>> Changed to use
>>
>> G1ConcurrentMark::_has_overflown
> I like this better.  I'd intended to make comments similar promises but he got there first.
>
>> Revised change is here:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aharlap/8165674/webrev.02/
> One very minor and nit:
>
> src/share/vm/gc/g1/g1ConcurrentMark.cpp
> 1746             "Mark stack should be empty (unless it is out of memory)");
>
> The assert message should refer to “overflow" rather than "out of memory”
>
> Looks good otherwise.
> I don't need a new webrev for a change there.
>