Request for review JDK-8165674 - G1CMMarkStack::out_of_memory possibly redundant

[Kim Barrett]

> On Mar 7, 2017, at 3:46 PM, Alexander Harlap <alexander.harlap at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kim,
> 
> How about:
> 
> "Mark stack should be empty (unless it has overflown)”

Sure, that looks good.

> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> On 3/7/2017 3:05 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Alexander Harlap <alexander.harlap at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Happy to get  review.
>>> 
>>> Changed to use
>>> 
>>> G1ConcurrentMark::_has_overflown
>> I like this better.  I'd intended to make comments similar promises but he got there first.
>> 
>>> Revised change is here:
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aharlap/8165674/webrev.02/
>> One very minor and nit:
>> 
>> src/share/vm/gc/g1/g1ConcurrentMark.cpp
>> 1746             "Mark stack should be empty (unless it is out of memory)");
>> 
>> The assert message should refer to “overflow" rather than "out of memory”
>> 
>> Looks good otherwise.
>> I don't need a new webrev for a change there.