RFR: 8214278: Cleanup process_completed_threshold and related state

[Thomas Schatzl]

Hi,

On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 15:50 -0500, Kim Barrett wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 2018, at 4:32 AM, Stefan Johansson <
> > stefan.johansson at oracle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I totally agree that the style guide doesn't give any real guidance
> > here. And as you say, we use every possible interpretation in the
> > code base already except maybe Camel_Snake. To me the most
> > important is the last bullet, that it should be easy to understand
> > that this is a constant. I also think the first point only talks
> > about *instance* variables, so not statics.
> > 
> > I don't see this as a blocker for this change, we have different
> > preferences and I'm ok with this patch as is.
> 
> I was going to write a longer reply, but decided this is the wrong
> forum for this discussion.  Just a couple of points:
> 
> Just to be clear, I *don't* prefer the style I used.  I'm okay with
> CamelCase, and am agreeing to make that change despite it being (IMO)
> contrary to the style guide.
> 
> And for the record, we do use something akin to Camel_Snake, e.g.
> Op_Reg* :)
> 
> New webrevs:
> full: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8214278/open.01/
> incr: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8214278/open.01.inc/
> 

 webrev.01 looks good.

Thanks,
  Thomas