RFR: 8214278: Cleanup process_completed_threshold and related state

[Kim Barrett]

> On Nov 27, 2018, at 4:32 PM, Thomas Schatzl <thomas.schatzl at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 15:50 -0500, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> On Nov 27, 2018, at 4:32 AM, Stefan Johansson <
>>> stefan.johansson at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I totally agree that the style guide doesn't give any real guidance
>>> here. And as you say, we use every possible interpretation in the
>>> code base already except maybe Camel_Snake. To me the most
>>> important is the last bullet, that it should be easy to understand
>>> that this is a constant. I also think the first point only talks
>>> about *instance* variables, so not statics.
>>> 
>>> I don't see this as a blocker for this change, we have different
>>> preferences and I'm ok with this patch as is.
>> 
>> I was going to write a longer reply, but decided this is the wrong
>> forum for this discussion.  Just a couple of points:
>> 
>> Just to be clear, I *don't* prefer the style I used.  I'm okay with
>> CamelCase, and am agreeing to make that change despite it being (IMO)
>> contrary to the style guide.
>> 
>> And for the record, we do use something akin to Camel_Snake, e.g.
>> Op_Reg* :)
>> 
>> New webrevs:
>> full: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8214278/open.01/
>> incr: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8214278/open.01.inc/
>> 
> 
> webrev.01 looks good.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Thomas

Thanks.