RFR (XS): 8233792: TestG1ParallelPhases.java fails with phase NonYoungFreeCSet not found (2)
Leo Korinth
leo.korinth at oracle.com
Mon Nov 11 16:45:43 UTC 2019
On 11/11/2019 16:44, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can I have reviews for this small test fix to avoid this test failing
> sometimes?
>
> The tests tries to force mixed gcs to wait for a particular JFR event
> only sent at that time.
> The way it forces those is a bit wrong: in some cases it may happen that
> at the time it starts a concurrent marking, another one just finished
> without being able to clean out the old gen. This means that the initial
> mark for this forced marking will be upgraded to a full gc (which also
> ends that marking), and the following forced young collections are
> young-only gcs only.
>
> In total, no mixed gcs happen in that case, and so that JFR event is
> never sent.
>
> The fix is to make sure that before forcing mixed gc (which works) we
> force the heap into a state where the upgrade to full gc may not happen
> - by forcing a full gc.
>
> Without the patch the fails like 6 times in 4000 runs, with the change
> it does not fail after 3k runs.
Looks good, thanks for finding and fixing this Thomas!
After looking at your fix, I also took a look at TestLogging.java and
TestOldGenCollectionUsage.java (from which I copied the code). Those
test cases does, in addition to this test case, also allocate in a loop
at the end and provokes a mixed gc by also setting
-XX:G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent=100. Even if those tests do "work", I
think those test cases ought to be cleaned up so that they do not fool
more people like me. If you think that is a good idea, I will create an
enhancement for cleanup of those test cases.
Thanks,
Leo
> CR:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233792
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8233792/webrev/
> Testing:
> see above.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list