Request for review: 8006629: NEED_TEST: need test for JDK-8001071

[Filipp Zhinkin]

Vladimir,

thank you. I suppose that to run JPRT I have to be an OpenJDK committer?

Thanks,
Filipp.

On 01/31/2013 12:01 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Looks good. I would suggest to run it through JPRT to test on all 
> platforms: -rtests '*-*-*-runtime/8001071'
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
> On 1/30/13 3:17 AM, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
>> Here is an updated webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8001071/webrev.01/
>>
>> All code related to BIT_FLAG was removed and BIT_FLAG was replaced by
>> TESTVMOPTS.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Filipp.
>>
>> On 01/23/2013 12:59 PM, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
>>> Vladimir,
>>>
>>> thanks for reply!I'll fix it.
>>>
>>> Filipp.
>>>
>>> On 01/22/2013 11:02 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>>> Filipp,
>>>>
>>>> You should never use BIT_FLAG! You should use ${TESTVMOPTS} to test
>>>> correct VM.
>>>>
>>>> Vladimir
>>>>
>>>> On 1/21/13 3:19 AM, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Would someone review the following regression test please?
>>>>>
>>>>> Test checks that debug VM will crashed on assert if offset
>>>>> passed to Unsafe's access methods is bigger than object size.
>>>>>
>>>>> To ensure that it is true, shell script execute Test8001071
>>>>> which tries to get object from huge offset.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only one Unsafe's method is checked because all other
>>>>> methods uses the same mechanism to get OOP from object
>>>>> using passed offset.
>>>>>
>>>>> Test passes only if hs_err_pid* file created and it contains
>>>>> tested assert. Test will also pass if product VM is tested.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8001071/webrev.00/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Filipp.
>>>
>>