Request for review: 8006629: NEED_TEST: need test for JDK-8001071

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Looks good. I would suggest to run it through JPRT to test on all 
platforms: -rtests '*-*-*-runtime/8001071'

Thanks,
Vladimir

On 1/30/13 3:17 AM, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
> Here is an updated webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8001071/webrev.01/
>
> All code related to BIT_FLAG was removed and BIT_FLAG was replaced by
> TESTVMOPTS.
>
> Thanks,
> Filipp.
>
> On 01/23/2013 12:59 PM, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
>> Vladimir,
>>
>> thanks for reply!I'll fix it.
>>
>> Filipp.
>>
>> On 01/22/2013 11:02 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>> Filipp,
>>>
>>> You should never use BIT_FLAG! You should use ${TESTVMOPTS} to test
>>> correct VM.
>>>
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>> On 1/21/13 3:19 AM, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Would someone review the following regression test please?
>>>>
>>>> Test checks that debug VM will crashed on assert if offset
>>>> passed to Unsafe's access methods is bigger than object size.
>>>>
>>>> To ensure that it is true, shell script execute Test8001071
>>>> which tries to get object from huge offset.
>>>>
>>>> Only one Unsafe's method is checked because all other
>>>> methods uses the same mechanism to get OOP from object
>>>> using passed offset.
>>>>
>>>> Test passes only if hs_err_pid* file created and it contains
>>>> tested assert. Test will also pass if product VM is tested.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8001071/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Filipp.
>>
>