RFR (M/XXS) cleanup more non-indent white space issues (8047156)

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

Thanks for the fast review!

Dan


On 6/17/14 8:12 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 6/17/14 6:12 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I forgot to update my list of files to clean for the latest version
>> of the cleanup bucket so I missed these seven files when I sent out
>> the review for:
>>
>>     JDK-8046758 cleanup non-indent white space issues prior to Contended
>>                 Locking cleanup bucket
>>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046758
>>
>> I have the fix for the following bug ready for JDK9 RT_Baseline:
>>
>>     JDK-8047156 cleanup more non-indent white space issues prior to
>>                 Contended Locking cleanup bucket
>>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047156
>>
>> This is both a (M)edium and e(X)tra e(X)tra (S)mall review! Here is the
>> URL for the (M)edium webrev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8047156-webrev/0-jdk9-hs-rt/
>>
>> Since these are white space fixes, I recommend the udiff links instead
>> of the frames links. Of course, some folks prefer the patch file itself
>> for white space fixes.
>>
>> Here is the URL for the e(X)tra e(X)tra (S)mall webrev which was 
>> generated with a version of webrev that ignores all whitespace changes:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8047156-webrev/0-jdk9-hs-rt-no_ws/
>>
>> Again, I recommend the udiff links since that's the fastest way to see
>> that webrev_no_ws found no non-white space changes. The patch file for
>> this webrev shows all the white space changes.
>>
>> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.
>>
>> At the end of the review cycle for this fix, I will attach the 
>> version of the do_space_filter.ksh script used to do the work to 
>> JDK-8047156.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>