RFR(S) 8030221: Checking for anonymous class should check for NULL as well as potential nesting

[Coleen Phillimore]

On 8/16/16 11:54 AM, harold seigel wrote:
> Hi Coleen,
>
> Thanks for the comments.  In a different fix, for bug JDK-8058575 
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058575>, I plan to require 
> the host class to be an instance class and change the type of 
> _host_klass to instanceKlass.

Okay, Thanks!
Coleen

>
> Thanks, Harold
>
>
> On 8/16/2016 10:48 AM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>>
>> Can host class actually be an array class?
>>
>> It seems like more error if the host class is a primitive, array, or 
>> if it is another anonymous class.
>>
>> Then you can pass it as InstanceKlass as host_class everwhere and not 
>> have these casts.
>>
>> Coleen
>>
>> On 8/15/16 3:34 PM, harold seigel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review this fix for JDK-8030221.  The fix makes sure that, if 
>>> the specified host class for a VM anonymous is another anonymous 
>>> class, that the actual host class is the specified host class's host 
>>> class.  For example, if named class N is the host class for 
>>> anonymous class A1, and A1 is the specified host class for anonymous 
>>> class A2, then the actual host class for A2 will be named class N.
>>>
>>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030221
>>>
>>> Open Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8030221/
>>>
>>> The fix was tested with the JCK Lang and VM tests, the hotpot, and 
>>> java/lang, java/util and other JTreg tests, the NSK quick tests, and 
>>> with the RBT runtime nightly tests.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Harold
>>
>