RFR(S): 8162412: Ignore any System property specified as -Djdk.module...

harold seigel harold.seigel at oracle.com
Tue Aug 30 19:14:13 UTC 2016


Hi Gerard,

Thanks for the review.

The "-D" comment refers to the property expected by the 
"Arguments::is_internal_module_property" method.

I can switch the order of PATCH and ADDREADS.

Thanks! Harold


On 8/30/2016 3:05 PM, Gerard Ziemski wrote:
> hi Harold,
>
> The code looks fine, I just have a question and tiny quibble:
>
> #1. This comment:
>
>   189 // Return true if property starts with "jdk.module." and its ensuing chars match
>   190 // any of the reserved module properties.
>   191 // property should be passed without the leading "-D".
>   192 bool Arguments::is_internal_module_property(const char* property) {
>
> about “-D” refers to the property expected by "Arguments::is_internal_module_property” method, not how the user passes it to the VM?
>
>
> #2. The only tiny quibble would be to put:
>
> 200         matches_property_suffix(property_suffix, PATCH, PATCH_LEN) ||
>
> right after
>
> 197         matches_property_suffix(property_suffix, ADDREADS, ADDREADS_LEN) ||
>
> to match their declaration order:
>
> 170 #define ADDREADS "addreads"
> 171 #define ADDREADS_LEN 8
> 172 #define PATCH "patch"
> 173 #define PATCH_LEN 5
>
>
> cheers
>
>> On Aug 30, 2016, at 12:47 PM, harold seigel <harold.seigel at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review this fix for JDK-8162412.  This fix allows user properties that start with "-Djdk.module." unless they match any of the seven reserved system properties as  follows:
>>
>>    The JVM will ignore -D<property>, -D<property>.[*], and
>>    -D<property>=[*] where <property> is any one of these seven:
>>
>>         jdk.module.addmods
>>         jdk.module.limitmods
>>         jdk.module.addexports
>>         jdk.module.addreads
>>         jdk.module.patch
>>         jdk.module.path
>>         jdk.module.upgrade.path
>>
>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162412
>>
>> Open webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8162412/
>>
>> The fix was tested with the JCK Lang and VM tests, the hotpot, and java/lang, java/util and other JTreg tests, and the NSK non-colocated quick tests.
>>
>> Thanks, Harold



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list