RFR: 8146947: Remove PrintOopAddress rather than converting to UL
Rachel Protacio
rachel.protacio at oracle.com
Tue Mar 22 20:06:53 UTC 2016
Hi,
On 3/22/2016 12:09 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>
> Hi Rachel,
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rprotacio/8146947/src/share/vm/oops/oop.cpp.udiff.html
>
>
> I think the line
>
> *-if (PrintOopAddress)print_address_on(st);*
>
>
> should be removed. For the case of a String that is in output for
> logging, it doesn't seem like it adds anything and then you wouldn't
> have to change the tests.
>
The part printing from the exceptions logging isn't from oop.cpp, but
klass.cpp#Klass::print_on(). Should I delete it from there instead?
Rachel
> Thanks,
> Coleen
>
> On 3/22/16 10:08 AM, Rachel Protacio wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please review this fix removing PrintOopAddress as a command line
>> flag. The printing functionality has been made default, except for
>> one block which has been removed (see bug description for
>> justification). A compatibility request has been accepted with
>> respect to this change.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146947
>> Open webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rprotacio/8146947/
>>
>> Passes JPRT and RBT hotspot and non-colo testing.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Rachel
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list