RFR: 8298733: Reconsider monitors_on_stack assert [v3]

[Fredrik Bredberg]

> This PR aims to revert this [8298371: monitors_on_stack extracts unprocessed oops](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11582) fix at the same time as we retain the ability to assert that we don't have any monitors on the stack when legacy locking is used.
> 
> It does so by moving an assert that ensures that we don't have any monitors on the stack to a place where all stack frames should have been processed. I.e. it's safe to check the frame for any monitor.
> 
> A new function called assert_frames_in_continuation_are_safe() asserts that the frames has been processed (i.e. it  safe to revert the [8298371](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11582) fix). By keeping that assertion functionality separate from monitors_on_stack() we will be able to keep that assertion after we have removed legacy locking.
> 
> In order to recreate the original [problem](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11582) and verifying that this PR works used, I used:
> `-XX:LockingMode=1 -XX:+UseZGC -XX:+ZVerifyOops -XX:ZCollectionIntervalMajor=0.001 Fuzz.java
> `
> 
> Also passes tier1-7.

Fredrik Bredberg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Updated after Patricio's second review

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24655/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24655/files/a6f9479f..4622c2dc

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=24655&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=24655&range=01-02

  Stats: 8 lines in 1 file changed: 4 ins; 3 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24655.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24655/head:pull/24655

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24655