<i18n dev> [PATCH FOR APPROVAL]: Additional test for 6584033

[Masayoshi Okutsu]

Thank you for providing the test case. The webrev looks good to me.

> Is it ok to push this to OpenJDK6 (swing forest as used for i18n)?
>   

Do you mean OpenJDK7? If so, yes, we use the swing forest for i18n.

Thanks,
Masayoshi

On 1/8/2010 2:13 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Bug 6584033 actually fixes two issues, the second relating to the
> interaction between the timezone setting, the security manager and
> signed jars: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=381
>
> It was fixed in OpenJDK7 b22, but there is no testcase to ensure this
> doesn't regress.  Mark Wielaard provided one and this has since been
> approved for OpenJDK6 by Joe Darcy (along with the backported fix):
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2009-December/001036.html
>
> Here's a webrev of the test as applied to OpenJDK6:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6584033/webrev.01/
>
> Is it ok to push this to OpenJDK6 (swing forest as used for i18n)?
>
> Thanks,
>