<i18n dev> Review request : 7180362: RFE: Implement date cutover functionality for currency.properties file

[Seán Coffey]

Latest webrev is available here : 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.7180362.3.jdk8/ 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecoffeys/webrev.7180362.3.jdk8/>

I've changed code so that ISO 8601 format is now expected.

regards,
Sean.

On 30/08/2012 17:17, Seán Coffey wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> just see your mail now (damn filters)
>
> Yes - this makes sense. I'll make the modification and run some more 
> tests to ensure all is ok.
> Updated webrev to follow. I'll also follow up with getting new change 
> approved with the
> compatibility/conformance team.
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 29/08/2012 22:00, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>> I object to the implementation of this change, specifically the date 
>> format -
>> "The format of date must be {@code 'yyyy-MM-dd-HH-mm-ss'}"
>>
>> There seems to be no reason not to use the standard ISO-8601 format
>> here - yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss
>>
>> Stephen
>> co-spec lead JSR-310
>>
>>
>> On 28 August 2012 14:48, Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 7180362 deals with an enhancement to allow the JRE specify cutover 
>>> dates
>>> when currency.properties file is provided. I've added the required 
>>> syntax to
>>> the new javadoc comments in Currency class.
>>>
>>> bug report :http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7180362
>>> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.7180362.1.jdk8/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecoffeys/webrev.7180362.1.jdk8/>
>>>
>>> I hope to port an almost identical change to 7u shortly. (minus API 
>>> javadoc
>>> comments)
>>>
>>> I've kept the testcase logic different to the JRE logic around how 
>>> the new
>>> property is parsed to better
>>> test the golden result expectations. (both approaches should be equal)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sean.
>