<i18n dev> [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8162531solaris.fontconfig.properties needs updating

[Vadim Pakhnushev]

+1

Vadim

On 24.09.2016 8:00, Philip Race wrote:
> 1) version change is only if the format is incompatible - so no change 
> there.
> 2) paths being absent is not a new issue. It has always been the case 
> that a
> file is not present on a system at runtime. This was historically very 
> common. The
> implementation should handle this.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 9/23/16, 8:17 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> The changes looks fine, should we increment version=1 to other 
>> version or it is not used? Unrelated question is how we validate all 
>> these paths if some of them are absent?
>>
>> On 23.09.16 8:08, Philip Race wrote:
>>> PING .. any takers on this two week old RFR ?
>>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>> On 9/8/16, 1:12 PM, Philip Race wrote:
>>>> [Fix i18n-dev address]
>>>>
>>>> -phil.
>>>>
>>>> On 9/8/16, 1:10 PM, Philip Race wrote:
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162531
>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8162531/
>>>>>
>>>>> Solaris 10 is not supported by JDK 9.
>>>>> This updates the fontconfig file to focus on the default set of fonts
>>>>> installed on Solaris 11 as part its desktop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Preference is given to the Arial, Times New Roman, and Courier New 
>>>>> fonts
>>>>> that are included with Solaris, as well as other monotype fonts.
>>>>> Dejavau Sans is listed for some fallback coverage of less commonly 
>>>>> used
>>>>> unicode blocks.
>>>>>
>>>>> 10646-1 encoding is referenced so as to reduce the number of entries.
>>>>> More UTF 8 locales were added since that is the default on Solaris 
>>>>> 11.
>>>>>
>>>>> -phil.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>