<i18n dev> RFR: JDK8U Backport of 8171049: Era.getDisplayName doesn't work with non-IsoChronology
Deepak Kejriwal
deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com
Wed Nov 7 12:09:28 UTC 2018
Hi Naoto,
Thanks for reviewing the fix. As you mentioned in review comment, I will add the copyright year 2018 in test case.
Regards,
Deepak
-----Original Message-----
From: Naoto Sato
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 11:58 PM
To: Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com>; core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>; i18n-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: <i18n dev> RFR: JDK8U Backport of 8171049: Era.getDisplayName doesn't work with non-IsoChronology
Looks good. Since you modified the test case, please add the copyright year 2018 in the test case before you push.
Naoto
On 11/4/18 10:26 PM, Deepak Kejriwal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Please review the fix for JDK8u Backport of
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171049
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171049/webrev.00/
>
>
>
> Master Bug changeset and Review details:
>
> JDK Change set:
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/965d4dde0086
>
> JDK Review Thread:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-August/04903
> 7.html
>
>
>
> New test file "TestEraDisplayName.java" added as part of fix is
> modified as per jdk 8 release:-
>
>
>
> . All test written in jdk 10 are written to verify the CLDR resource. Since, in case of jdk 8 "CLDR" is not default locale providers, added Djava.locale.providers=CLDR as JVM parameter to test.
>
> . Some resource keys in jdk 8 does not exist in both CLDR and JRE due to which Era.getDisplayName() returns numeric value. Modified such test cases accordingly.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Deepak
>
More information about the i18n-dev
mailing list