RFR : JDK-8215599 : Remove support for javadoc "frames" mode
Jonathan Gibbons
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Sat Mar 9 01:18:32 UTC 2019
On 03/08/2019 03:12 AM, Priya Lakshmi Muthuswamy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kindly review the changes for removal of frames.
> Removed the script for setting window title which was needed for
> frames and also the boolean includeScript,
> which was false for overview-frame,allclasses-frame and package-frame
> and true for all other cases.
>
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215599
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pmuthuswamy/8215599/webrev.00/
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215603
>
> Thanks,
> Priya
>
>
AbstractModuleIndexWriter.java
lines 243,244
You're creating an empty list and adding it to the header.
I think you can delete these lines.
AbstractPackageIndexWriter.java
line 43: bad grammar in comment "sub-classed by to"
IndexRedirectWriter
line 81: it's an unrelated change, but looks OK
ModuleIndexWriter
old lines 98-106: please explain why you have deleted these lines
they don't look immediately related to the Frames support.
standard.properties
The message needs fixing. The user has asked for "no frames"
and the message is about "frames": i.e. it's not directly related
to what the user did. I suggest:
445 doclet.NoFrames_specified=\
446 The --no-frames option is no longer required and may be removed\n
447 in a future release.
DocPaths.java
I'm slightly surprised there were quite so many variants of
allclasses*.html files!
TestGeneratedBY.java
You've commented out a test ...
-- Jon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/attachments/20190308/7a0fd9af/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the javadoc-dev
mailing list