RFR : JDK-8215599 : Remove support for javadoc "frames" mode

Priya Lakshmi Muthuswamy priya.lakshmi.muthuswamy at oracle.com
Mon Mar 11 13:28:15 UTC 2019


Hi Jon,

Thanks for the review.
I have updated the webrev.

webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pmuthuswamy/8215599/webrev.01/

Reg ModuleIndexWriter, old lines 98-106:
After removing frames, the methods AllClassesLink/AllModulesLink have 
been removed as they implemented in frame classes.
With out these, we are just creating empty list. That's the reason for 
deleting these lines.
This change is similar to AbstractModuleIndexWriter lines old lines 
251-258, in the updated webrev, i have removed the creation of empty list.

Thanks,
Priya

On 3/9/2019 6:48 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/08/2019 03:12 AM, Priya Lakshmi Muthuswamy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kindly review the changes for removal of frames.
>> Removed the script for setting window title which was needed for 
>> frames and also the boolean includeScript,
>> which was false for overview-frame,allclasses-frame and package-frame 
>> and true for all other cases.
>>
>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215599
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pmuthuswamy/8215599/webrev.00/
>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215603
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Priya
>>
>>
>
>
> AbstractModuleIndexWriter.java
> lines 243,244
> You're creating an empty list and adding it to the header.
> I think you can delete these lines.
>
> AbstractPackageIndexWriter.java
> line 43:  bad grammar in comment "sub-classed by to"
>
>
> IndexRedirectWriter
> line 81: it's an unrelated change, but looks OK
>
>
> ModuleIndexWriter
> old lines 98-106: please explain why you have deleted these lines
> they don't look immediately related to the Frames support.
>
> standard.properties
> The message needs fixing. The user has asked for "no frames"
> and the message is about "frames": i.e. it's not directly related
> to what the user did. I suggest:
> 445 doclet.NoFrames_specified=\
> 446 The --no-frames option is no longer required and may be removed\n
> 447 in a future release.
>
> DocPaths.java
> I'm slightly surprised there were quite so many variants of 
> allclasses*.html files!
>
> TestGeneratedBY.java
> You've commented out a test ...
>
> -- Jon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/attachments/20190311/aeea4546/attachment.html>


More information about the javadoc-dev mailing list