Consolidating memory leak related labels in JBS

Aleksei Ivanov alexey.ivanov at oracle.com
Thu Sep 22 18:31:17 UTC 2022


‘memory-leak’ is easier to parse than ‘memoryleak’.

It is good to unify them into only one.

--
Regards,
Alexey

On 22/09/2022 16:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> No objection from me. We use at least "leak", "memoryleak", and 
> "memory-leak" in various JavaFX bugs, and it seems good to unify this.
>
> -- Kevin
>
> On 9/22/2022 8:35 AM, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In JBS we currently have the labels:
>>
>> memoryleak
>> memory-leak
>> memory_leak
>> Memoryleak
>> MemoryLeak
>> MemoryLeaks
>> leak
>> Leak
>> leaks
>> leakage
>>
>> All these seems to mainly be used to tag issues concerning memory 
>> leaks and are used by several teams. No area or group seems to have 
>> focused on one of these labels, it seems everyone is in agreement 
>> that any of these will do just fine - judging by label usage in JBS.
>>
>> Are there any objections to merging all of these into using ONLY 
>> "memoryleak" and get rid of the rest?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> /Jesper
>>
>



More information about the jdk-dev mailing list