Consolidating memory leak related labels in JBS

[Mikhailo Seledtsov]

+1

Thank you for doing this.

> On Sep 22, 2022, at 11:31 AM, Aleksei Ivanov <alexey.ivanov at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> ‘memory-leak’ is easier to parse than ‘memoryleak’.
> 
> It is good to unify them into only one.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Alexey
> 
> On 22/09/2022 16:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> No objection from me. We use at least "leak", "memoryleak", and "memory-leak" in various JavaFX bugs, and it seems good to unify this.
>> 
>> -- Kevin
>> 
>> On 9/22/2022 8:35 AM, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> In JBS we currently have the labels:
>>> 
>>> memoryleak
>>> memory-leak
>>> memory_leak
>>> Memoryleak
>>> MemoryLeak
>>> MemoryLeaks
>>> leak
>>> Leak
>>> leaks
>>> leakage
>>> 
>>> All these seems to mainly be used to tag issues concerning memory leaks and are used by several teams. No area or group seems to have focused on one of these labels, it seems everyone is in agreement that any of these will do just fine - judging by label usage in JBS.
>>> 
>>> Are there any objections to merging all of these into using ONLY "memoryleak" and get rid of the rest?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> /Jesper
>>> 
>> 
>