Anonymity and observability of unnamed classes (JEP 445)

[Attila Kelemen]

Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2023. máj. 7.,
V, 21:36):
>
> Then perhaps you can unpack this claim:
>
> > but implicit static
>

I'm honestly puzzled on how you came to the conclusion that this means
that I think main is implicitly static (maybe the actual correct way
to phrase it would have been " implicit static to be a new dialect"
rather than " implicit static is a new dialect", but still I'm not a
native english speaker, please give me a break). I was talking about
my perceived inconsistency of the reasoning of the JEP. That is, that
it does not consider itself a new dialect, but it says that implicit
static would be a new dialect.