OpenJDK 11u backport of JDK-8148188: Enhance the security libraries to record events of interest

Tim Bell tim.bell at oracle.com
Mon Jun 24 14:06:39 UTC 2019


On 06/22/19 15:18, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Thanks, David.
>
> Then I probably did the right thing by manually creating the backport bug.

You did the right thing.

> cc-ing ops at o.j.n: Maybe you want to have a look why hgupdater failed in this case?

hgupdater found a confidential backport record created for JDK 6 and 
closed as 'will not fix'.  hgupdater should not have used that backport, 
but it did.  I can see it in the History in JBS.

I undid the changes it made, and I'll file a bug against hgupdater.

Tim

>
> Cheers
> Christoph
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>
>> Sent: Sonntag, 23. Juni 2019 00:15
>> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; jdk-updates-
>> dev at openjdk.java.net; security-dev <security-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>> Subject: Re: OpenJDK 11u backport of JDK-8148188: Enhance the security
>> libraries to record events of interest
>>
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> On 22/06/2019 2:25 pm, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I pushed the backport of JDK-8148188 [0] to jdk11u-dev [1] on Friday. I was
>> wondering why no 11.0.5 backport JBS item was created. I then manually
>> created JDK-8226636 [2], but the minute I had created it I got an idea what
>> the reason for that strange JBS/hgupdater behavior was (all other pushes
>> around this commit seem to have correct backport bugs). I now suspect that
>> there existed a confidential 11-pool backport item already which was
>> resolved by my push.
>>>
>>> Can anybody within Oracle please check this and if I’m correct, please also
>> check whether the backport bug can be made public? I’d then close JDK-
>> 8226636 as duplicate. But maybe I’m wrong with that guess… please
>> enlighten me ��
>>
>> No there was no confidential issue resolved by your push. I would have
>> to suspect hgupdater may be down, or else some other hgupdater
>> configuration problem.
>>
>> David
>> ------
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Christoph
>>>
>>> [0] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8148188
>>> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u-dev/rev/5f98a6a92842
>>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8226636
>>>



More information about the jdk-updates-dev mailing list