[15u] MonitorInfo bugs: JDK-8249192 and JDK-8251118

[Robert McKenna]

Thomas, I don't see any obvious reason why this was not pushed to the 
OpenJDK repo. Can you rectify this as soon as you get the chance.

Aleksey, apologies for missing this, and thanks for the heads up. In 
future please include the responsible engineer for the bug in the mail 
(cc'ing the alias and me)

     -Rob

On 25/11/2020 08:34, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Rob,
>
> On 11/18/20 2:17 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 11/11/20 11:00 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> I asked this question in the relevant RFR threads, but they 
>>> apparently went unnoticed. Therefore,
>>> let me ask this in a new thread.
>>>
>>> This is about the following issues:
>>>      8249192: MonitorInfo stores raw oops across safepoints
>>>      8251118: BiasedLocking::preserve_marks should not have a HandleMar
>>>
>>> At the time 15.0.1 was open for pushes, it had been stated that both 
>>> issues were pushed to some CPU
>>> repo. I was under impression it was to appear in 15.0.1 release, but 
>>> it did not. So, there are no
>>> changes in current 15u:
>>> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk15u/log?rev=8249192
>>> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk15u/log?rev=8251118
>>>
>>> There is still the "Resolved" backport in 15.0.2 for one of the issues:
>>>       https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251485
>>>
>>> ...and there is no resolved backport for another.
>>>
>>> So, is there a private 15.0.2 CPU repo within Oracle? Are we 
>>> expecting both issues to come with
>>> 15.0.2 CPU push? Even in this case, can we push the change to open 
>>> 15.0.2, so we would be able to
>>> test it in open repositories before next CPU hits?
>>
>> Friendly reminder.
>
> Another friendly reminder.
>