[15u] MonitorInfo bugs: JDK-8249192 and JDK-8251118

[Robert McKenna]

W.r.t. 8251118 - I don't see a record of a 15u push after you requested 
fix approval.

     -Rob

On 30/11/2020 13:33, Robert McKenna wrote:
> Thomas, I don't see any obvious reason why this was not pushed to the 
> OpenJDK repo. Can you rectify this as soon as you get the chance.
>
> Aleksey, apologies for missing this, and thanks for the heads up. In 
> future please include the responsible engineer for the bug in the mail 
> (cc'ing the alias and me)
>
>     -Rob
>
> On 25/11/2020 08:34, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Rob,
>>
>> On 11/18/20 2:17 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> On 11/11/20 11:00 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>>> Hi again,
>>>>
>>>> I asked this question in the relevant RFR threads, but they 
>>>> apparently went unnoticed. Therefore,
>>>> let me ask this in a new thread.
>>>>
>>>> This is about the following issues:
>>>>      8249192: MonitorInfo stores raw oops across safepoints
>>>>      8251118: BiasedLocking::preserve_marks should not have a 
>>>> HandleMar
>>>>
>>>> At the time 15.0.1 was open for pushes, it had been stated that 
>>>> both issues were pushed to some CPU
>>>> repo. I was under impression it was to appear in 15.0.1 release, 
>>>> but it did not. So, there are no
>>>> changes in current 15u:
>>>> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk15u/log?rev=8249192
>>>> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk15u/log?rev=8251118
>>>>
>>>> There is still the "Resolved" backport in 15.0.2 for one of the 
>>>> issues:
>>>>       https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251485
>>>>
>>>> ...and there is no resolved backport for another.
>>>>
>>>> So, is there a private 15.0.2 CPU repo within Oracle? Are we 
>>>> expecting both issues to come with
>>>> 15.0.2 CPU push? Even in this case, can we push the change to open 
>>>> 15.0.2, so we would be able to
>>>> test it in open repositories before next CPU hits?
>>>
>>> Friendly reminder.
>>
>> Another friendly reminder.
>>
>