[jdk11u-dev] RFR: JDK-8253947: Implementation: JEP 388: Windows AArch64 Support

[Vladimir Kempik]

On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 13:29:16 GMT, Vladimir Kempik <vkempik at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Also, could you please be more specific, which parts of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/ec9bee68 were taken and which wasn't ?
>> it's not trivial to find them in this PR. 
>> Thanks
>
>> @VladimirKempik, changes to
>> 
>> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/vm_version_aarch64.cpp,
>> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/vm_version_aarch64.hpp, and
>> * src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_aarch64/vm_version_linux_aarch64.cpp
>> 
>> were taken over from [openjdk/jdk at ec9bee6](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/ec9bee68). However, now that we're breaking up the PR into its elements, it might make sense to backport this whole commit separately too. WDYT?
> 
> Ok, I will do the JDK-8248414 ( it's already reviewed) and its follow-ups: JDK-8250824 and JDK-JDK-8251930.
> And Anton's fix for vm_version

> > > @VladimirKempik, changes to
> > > 
> > > * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/vm_version_aarch64.cpp,
> > > * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/vm_version_aarch64.hpp, and
> > > * src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_aarch64/vm_version_linux_aarch64.cpp
> > > 
> > > were taken over from [openjdk/jdk at ec9bee6](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/ec9bee68). However, now that we're breaking up the PR into its elements, it might make sense to backport this whole commit separately too. WDYT?
> > 
> > 
> > Ok, I will do the JDK-8248414 ( it's already reviewed) and its follow-ups: JDK-8250824 and JDK-JDK-8251930.
> 
> Thank you. I assume these are prerequisites to JDK-8253015.
> 
> > And Anton's fix for vm_version
> 
> Which one is that?

You can take https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8253015

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/pull/222