Backporting JDK-8217264 on JDK11u

[Brice Dutheil]

Hi Christopher,

I'm not familiar with the CSR process, do you have some pointers ?
Thanks in advance

-- Brice


On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:42 AM Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
wrote:

> Hi Brice,
>
>
>
> sounds good. For the javadoc change we might think about going through the
> CSR process to be on the safe side (although the original change doesn’t
> have a CSR attached). But in my opinion the javadoc change is worthwhile
> doing, too.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Christoph
>
>
>
> *From:* Brice Dutheil <brice.dutheil at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2022 10:39
> *To:* Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> *Cc:* jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.org
> *Subject:* Re: Backporting JDK-8217264 on JDK11u
>
>
>
> You don't often get email from brice.dutheil at gmail.com. Learn why this is
> important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
>
> Hi Chrstopher,
>
>
>
> Thank you for the feedback.
>
>
>
> I will go ahead with maybe two PR: one for the javadoc and one for the
> deadlock prevention fix.
>
>
>
> On Mon 10 Oct 2022 at 18:07 Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Brice,
>
>
>
> yes, the backport you suggest seems appropriate. Please go ahead with a PR
> if you like.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Christoph
>
>
>
> *From:* jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.org> *On Behalf Of *Brice
> Dutheil
> *Sent:* Samstag, 1. Oktober 2022 14:01
> *To:* jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.org
> *Subject:* Backporting JDK-8217264 on JDK11u
>
>
>
> Some people who received this message don't often get email from
> brice.dutheil at gmail.com. Learn why this is important
> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I was redirected there, to ask about backporting some fixes made to
> `HttpClient` to JDK11u.
>
>
>
> Indeed, some API usage around the BodySubscribers with a common need of
> handling GZipped HTTP payload, are problematic (results in a deadlock) on
> JDK11 because,
>
>
>
> 1. The API is improperly documented ; this was fixed in JDK 13 with
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8217627
>
> 2. Daniel fuchs contributed a mechanism that prevents the deadlock, also
> contributed in JDK 13 with https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8217264
>
>
>
> While I would prefer users to upgrade to a more recent JDK, I believe
> fixing this deadlock on an LTS seems appropriate.
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance for considering the backport of these fixes.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Brice
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/attachments/20221011/050c0212/attachment.htm>