[jdk25u-dev] RFR: 8365065: cancelled ForkJoinPool tasks no longer throw CancellationException

[Goetz Lindenmaier]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:00:46 GMT, Roland Mesde <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8365065: Cancelled ForkJoinPool tasks no longer throw CancellationException. Fixes the exception propagation and tests. Based on the original bug it is a regression and it last worked in version 17.0.16. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> (Passed) - make test-tier1
> (Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/util/concurrent
> 
> Results are attached.
> 
> [linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776572/linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776573/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776574/linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776575/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776576/macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776577/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776578/windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23776579/windows-x64-specific-test.log)

Hi @rm-gh-8 
Please supply sufficient approval request comments.
Read https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/JDKUpdates/How+to+contribute+or+backport+a+fix thoroughly please! Expecially 6 ii)
You need to talk about:
*Why you backport.  Why should the change go to the update release (No, not because it fixes the bug!)
*The risk of breaking anything, especially running applications that obtain an update.
*Short description of how you backported (clean? trivial edit? other changes included?)
*Clean is only clean if Skara says so!
*Short test overview.
This goes to the JBS issue, it needs to make sense there.  If you repeat the title of the bug that's quite pointless.

I will silently remove the fix request labels if the approval comment does not help me to assess the backport. Later, I might just reject them.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/3#issuecomment-3606514225