Security fixes are back; other fixes can go in. Time for build 18?

Andrew John Hughes gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org
Tue Dec 8 14:31:08 PST 2009


2009/12/8 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> 2009/12/8 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2009/12/8 Kelly O'Hair <Kelly.Ohair at sun.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Finally, during build, I just spotted another issue.  The langtools
>>>>>>> build wrongly passes -Werror to javac and this has been removed in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> OpenJDK7 version.  It only shows up if you build OpenJDK6 with
>>>>>>> OpenJDK7, so it's minor but probably worth fixing.  I doubt that is
>>>>>>> the only building-with-7 issue though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Building OpenJDK6  "with"  OpenJDK7?
>>>>> You mean with an ALT_BOOTDIR=jdk7? Why?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why not? I happen to have a system install of OpenJDK7 m5 and not
>>>> OpenJDK6 at present - the reason for that is exactly because you can't
>>>> install 7 and then use it to build 6.  I've since been able to build
>>>> OpenJDK6 using a recent build of IcedTea6 (which uses gcj to build).
>>>> But surely 7 should be able to build 6?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I suspect the build issue is that the JDK 7 Werror checking is more
>>> stringent than the OpenJDK 6 error checking and the OpenJDK 6 sources do
>>> not
>>> have the fixes necessary to build under JDK 7 using Werror although they
>>> do
>>> build under OpenJDK 6 with Werror.
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Indeed, the OJ7 version has this fix:
>>
>> changeset:   214:9d541fd2916b
>> parent:      212:49281ea88125
>> user:        jjg
>> date:        Fri Feb 06 10:23:57 2009 -0800
>> summary:     6595666: fix -Werror
>>
>> which includes actually documenting the option in the javac output.
>> I missed Jonathan's later change because I was searching for Werror
>> rather than checking that file.
>> Can we backport the warning fixup?
>>
>
> I'm open to OpenJDK 6 langtools  being made Werror clean as judged by JDK 7,
> but backporting the fixes may be nontrivial.  (The Werror checking in JDK
> 7's javac is more stringent than that in OpenJDK 6.)
>
> -Joe
>

I think we got sidetracked by the minor mention I made of this.  To go
back a few steps -- do you have an opinion on the timezone fixes?
-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8


More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list