Code review request for 4891262 "API spec, javax/accessibility: few invalid javadoc tags"

Andrew John Hughes gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org
Tue Dec 15 12:58:38 PST 2009


2009/12/10 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> 2009/12/10 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2009/12/10 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> While doing a coredocs build, I noticed once again some javadoc
>>>>> warnings
>>>>> coming out of the javax.accessibility package and I decided to fix
>>>>> them;
>>>>> the
>>>>> patch is below and the full webrev is at
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/4891262.0/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Again, good to see these being fixed.  What do you think to the idea
>>>> of backporting these fixes to OpenJDK6 for the next release (b19)?
>>>> It's not a major issue, but would improve the documentation packages
>>>> being installed by GNU/Linux distros.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Andrew, if you wish, you have my approval to apply the fix for 4891262
>>> (just
>>> pushed into JDK 7 TL) and also
>>>
>>> 6909070 "Missing package statements in java.text.Bidi @see links"
>>>
>>> to OpenJDK 6 build 18, the current build.
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks.  I'll do that once I get the current timezone patch off my
>> stack.  I suggest we leave a full blitz of such warnings until b19
>> though, otherwise b18 has the potential to go on for ever :)
>>
>
> Build 19 would be fine too, but at least for now there will be at most one
> or two more doc warnings patches from me in the near future :-)
>
> -Joe
>

Moving discussion to jdk6-dev as it concerns OpenJDK6 primarily.

My hesitation was because I didn't think the baseline was as good for
OpenJDK6 as OpenJDK7 because a number of earlier patches were never
backported.

I did a build and that is the case; there are a lot of javadoc
warnings that are fixed in 7 and thus there are changesets to
backport.

The first fix is

6810915: Sun proprietary warnings in JDK build
Reviewed-by: ohair
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6810915/webrev.01/

which cuts down significantly on the 1789 warnings currently produced
by turning off the 'warning: sun.a\
wt.SunHints is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future
release; style warnings.

Ok to push?
-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8


More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list