b17

[Joseph D. Darcy]

Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/10/2 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>:
>   
>> 2009/10/1 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>     
>>> Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> 2009/9/30 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Now that HotSpot 14 is merged, are we going to have a b17 release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Real soon now :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> I thought this is what we were waiting on, but it seems more
>>>>>>> changesets are being added
>>>>>>> (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/f754eab3d93a)
>>>>>>> without any public discussion on the mailing list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> There is another javac fix to go back in b17 and a recently added test
>>>>>> needs
>>>>>> to be moved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Ok, are these backports from OpenJDK7? I haven't seen anything on the
>>>>> list other than the commits.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> I'd also like to see a port of your DeoptimizeALot fix since I think it
>>>>>> affects one of the tests currently in the OpenJDK 6 HotSpot repo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6886353/webrev.01/
>>>>>
>>>>> Same bug, same bug ID, different patch.  The two tests affected in
>>>>> hs17 aren't present in hs14, but a test that's not in hs17 is.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Please push this change.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>>> The preliminary tests I've run on b17 look good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> What tests?  JTreg or something else?
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> jtreg.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I think IcedTea6 has support for building against hg.  We should do
>>>>> that before the release.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Sounds prudent.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Other than Andrew's fix for the HotSpot test, all the planned fixes for b17
>>> are back in the OpenJDK 6 repository now so it would be a good time to start
>>> building and testing IcedTea6 against the upstream repo.
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> I committed this yesterday morning:
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/012339cadcba
>>
>> I'm currently working on getting IcedTea6 building with my hg
>> checkout, and will push this to my personal branch:
>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/people/andrew/icedtea6
>> when I'm done.  There are a lot of patches that are now redundant :)
>>
>> Are all the recent security patches in JDK6 hg?
>>     

Yes, OpenJDK 6 is up to date on security fixes.

>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Andrew :-)
>>
>> Free Java Software Engineer
>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>
>> Support Free Java!
>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>
>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>
>>     
>
> It seems hs14 doesn't have the IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions flag
> itself.  This webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6788376/
>
> backported from OpenJDK7:
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/323728917cf4
> adds it.  It also includes the change to the test I added with the
> last changeset.
>
> It seems this was added to IcedTea6 but not backported to OpenJDK6.
>
> Ok to push?
>   

Yes, approved to push.

Thanks,

-Joe