b17

[Andrew John Hughes]

2009/10/2 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> 2009/10/2 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>:
>>
>>>
>>> 2009/10/1 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009/9/30 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now that HotSpot 14 is merged, are we going to have a b17 release?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Real soon now :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I thought this is what we were waiting on, but it seems more
>>>>>>>> changesets are being added
>>>>>>>> (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/f754eab3d93a)
>>>>>>>> without any public discussion on the mailing list.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is another javac fix to go back in b17 and a recently added
>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>> needs
>>>>>>> to be moved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, are these backports from OpenJDK7? I haven't seen anything on the
>>>>>> list other than the commits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd also like to see a port of your DeoptimizeALot fix since I think
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> affects one of the tests currently in the OpenJDK 6 HotSpot repo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6886353/webrev.01/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same bug, same bug ID, different patch.  The two tests affected in
>>>>>> hs17 aren't present in hs14, but a test that's not in hs17 is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please push this change.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The preliminary tests I've run on b17 look good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What tests?  JTreg or something else?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> jtreg.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think IcedTea6 has support for building against hg.  We should do
>>>>>> that before the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds prudent.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> Other than Andrew's fix for the HotSpot test, all the planned fixes for
>>>> b17
>>>> are back in the OpenJDK 6 repository now so it would be a good time to
>>>> start
>>>> building and testing IcedTea6 against the upstream repo.
>>>>
>>>> -Joe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I committed this yesterday morning:
>>>
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/012339cadcba
>>>
>>> I'm currently working on getting IcedTea6 building with my hg
>>> checkout, and will push this to my personal branch:
>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/people/andrew/icedtea6
>>> when I'm done.  There are a lot of patches that are now redundant :)
>>>
>>> Are all the recent security patches in JDK6 hg?
>>>
>
> Yes, OpenJDK 6 is up to date on security fixes.
>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --
>>> Andrew :-)
>>>
>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>
>>> Support Free Java!
>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>
>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It seems hs14 doesn't have the IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions flag
>> itself.  This webrev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6788376/
>>
>> backported from OpenJDK7:
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/323728917cf4
>> adds it.  It also includes the change to the test I added with the
>> last changeset.
>>
>> It seems this was added to IcedTea6 but not backported to OpenJDK6.
>>
>> Ok to push?
>>
>
> Yes, approved to push.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Joe
>
>

Thanks, pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/f6c52a081457

A version of IcedTea6 which builds against current hg (which will
become b17) is now available in
http://icedtea.classpath.org/people/andrew/icedtea6

The langtools JTreg tests all pass, as do the HotSpot tests in OpenJDK6.

There is a testcase related to
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6707044 which was
never added upstream when the bug was fixed, and which seems to have
been disabled in IcedTea when we switched to hs14.  Re-enabling it
shows that this fails with b17.

----------messages:(3/133)----------
command: main  -XbatchLuceneCrash
reason: User specified action: run main/othervm -Xbatch LuceneCrash
elapsed time (seconds): 0.203
----------System.out:(18/635)----------
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00002ba66acd4b50, pid=23877, tid=47996055058704
#
# JRE version: 6.0-b16
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (14.0-b16 mixed mode linux-amd64 )
# Distribution: Custom build (Fri Oct  2 21:43:43 BST 2009)
# Problematic frame:
# V  [libjvm.so+0x58fb50]

It claims to produce a log under JTwork/scratch but I don't see one.

I haven't run the whole JDK test suite.  I may leave it running overnight.

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8