JTreg errors in OpenJDK6 - missing HTML files

[Pavel Tisnovsky]

Joe Darcy wrote:
>   Hello.
> 
> On 04/28/10 06:14 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> On 28 April 2010 13:10, Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisnovs at redhat.com> <mailto:ptisnovs at redhat.com> wrote:
>>   
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I saw that some JTreg tests, specifically:
>>>
>>> java/awt/Focus/ActualFocusedWindowTest/ActualFocusedWindowBlockingTest.java
>>> java/awt/Focus/ActualFocusedWindowTest/ActualFocusedWindowRetaining.java
>>>  java/awt/Focus/NonFocusableWindowTest/NonfocusableOwnerTest.java
>>>
>>> fails due to absence of HTML files from which these tests are started as
>>> applets.
>>>     
> 
> I looked into those error messages a little bit; the corresponding tests 
> pass fine on JDK 7 and JDK 7 doesn't have the *.html files reported as 
> missing in OpenJDK 6.

The tests itself is different in JDK 7. While in JDK 6 these tests are 
started as applets in JDK 7 the tests are modified to run as regular 
Java application.

> 
>>> There are some error messages:
>>> Error. Can't find HTML file:
>>> /jck/icedtea6/openjdk/jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/ActualFocusedWindowTest/ActualFocusedWindowBlockingTest.html
>>> Error. Can't find HTML file:
>>> /jck/icedtea6/openjdk/jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/ActualFocusedWindowTest/ActualFocusedWindowRetaining.html
>>> Error. Can't find HTML file:
>>> /jck/icedtea6/openjdk/jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/NonFocusableWindowTest/NonfocusableOwnerTest.html
>>>
>>> May I write the required HTML files or are these files missing due to some
>>> improper commit?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Pavel
>>>
>>>     
>> I think this fix needs to be backported:
>>
>> changeset:   202:4a6dd11fe9fc
>> user:        ant
>> date:        Wed Mar 26 17:38:26 2008 +0300
>> summary:     6616792: five AWT focus regression tests should be fixed
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/rev/4a6dd11fe9fc
>>
>> Joe, ok for OpenJDK6?
>>   
> 
> If applying the patch resolves the test failures, I approve it going 
> back now.
> 
> I've been thinking a bit more about the changes to accept for this 
> build.  Other than the copyright changes (a general message about those 
> coming soon), I think it would be helpful to also take back any fixes 
> from JDK 7 applied to IcedTea but not OpenJDK 6, etc., before the 
> copyright swap occurs.
> 
> -Joe