JTreg errors in OpenJDK6 - missing HTML files

[Joe Darcy]

On 04/29/10 04:38 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 29 April 2010 18:40, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>   
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 04/28/10 06:14 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 28 April 2010 13:10, Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisnovs at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I saw that some JTreg tests, specifically:
>>
>> java/awt/Focus/ActualFocusedWindowTest/ActualFocusedWindowBlockingTest.java
>> java/awt/Focus/ActualFocusedWindowTest/ActualFocusedWindowRetaining.java
>>  java/awt/Focus/NonFocusableWindowTest/NonfocusableOwnerTest.java
>>
>> fails due to absence of HTML files from which these tests are started as
>> applets.
>>
>>
>> I looked into those error messages a little bit; the corresponding tests
>> pass fine on JDK 7 and JDK 7 doesn't have the *.html files reported as
>> missing in OpenJDK 6.
>>
>> There are some error messages:
>> Error. Can't find HTML file:
>> /jck/icedtea6/openjdk/jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/ActualFocusedWindowTest/ActualFocusedWindowBlockingTest.html
>> Error. Can't find HTML file:
>> /jck/icedtea6/openjdk/jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/ActualFocusedWindowTest/ActualFocusedWindowRetaining.html
>> Error. Can't find HTML file:
>> /jck/icedtea6/openjdk/jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/NonFocusableWindowTest/NonfocusableOwnerTest.html
>>
>> May I write the required HTML files or are these files missing due to some
>> improper commit?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Pavel
>>
>>
>>
>> I think this fix needs to be backported:
>>
>> changeset:   202:4a6dd11fe9fc
>> user:        ant
>> date:        Wed Mar 26 17:38:26 2008 +0300
>> summary:     6616792: five AWT focus regression tests should be fixed
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/rev/4a6dd11fe9fc
>>
>> Joe, ok for OpenJDK6?
>>
>>
>> If applying the patch resolves the test failures, I approve it going back
>> now.
>>     
>
> It syncs the tests with JDK7, removing the HTML file references.
>
> Pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/4684c385160e
>
>   

Thanks.

>> I've been thinking a bit more about the changes to accept for this build.
>> Other than the copyright changes (a general message about those coming
>> soon), I think it would be helpful to also take back any fixes from JDK 7
>> applied to IcedTea but not OpenJDK 6, etc., before the copyright swap
>> occurs.
>>
>>     
>
> I'll take a look next week, though I think most IcedTea patches are in
> neither version of OpenJDK at present (most backports have been pushed
> upstream).
>
>   

Acknowledged.

-Joe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/attachments/20100429/e4776489/attachment.html