HotSpot 16 and OpenJDK6

Andrew John Hughes gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org
Tue Feb 23 17:09:28 PST 2010


On 24 February 2010 00:28, Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com> wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 23 February 2010 20:10, Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's the merge:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jdk6-hs16-merge/webrev.01/
>>>>
>>>> which now builds, thanks to this additional changeset from Daniel
>>>> Daugherty in baseline:
>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx16/baseline/rev/c9740f5ed5b4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It also includes an additional fix, also listed separately at:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jdk6-hs16-merge/webrev.02/
>>>>
>>>> which reverts an erroneous change from SIZE_FORMAT to %d in
>>>>
>>>> changeset:   734:dbbe28fc66b5
>>>> user:        twisti
>>>> date:        Fri Feb 27 03:35:40 2009 -0800
>>>> summary:     6778669: Patch from Red Hat -- fixes compilation errors
>>>>
>>>> fixing the build on x86_64.  We'll need a bug ID for this reversion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The webrev generally looks good, but I have a few questions and comments
>>> before this goes back.
>>>
>>> Do you know why webrev shows so many files with zero changes?  I assume
>>> this
>>> is an artifact of the merge.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No, you're right that does seem strange.  All I did was a pull from
>> hs16 and then a merge.  Perhaps this is some webrev oddity?
>>
>> If you look at
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-February/001230.html
>> I included a diff of the merged OpenJDK6 against the hs16 master
>> (which includes Daniel's patch that is currently only in baseline).
>> It actually makes the other questions below a bit clearer.
>>
>
> Yes, that patch size is more manageable!
>
>>
>>>
>>> In hotspot_version, what are the semantics of JDK_PREVIOUS_VERSION?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure.  It doesn't seem to do much.  Its only use is to set a
>> default BOOTDIR AFAICS:
>>
>> # Find JDK used for javac compiles
>>
>> BOOTDIR=$(SLASH_JAVA)/re/j2se/$(PREVIOUS_JDK_VERSION)/latest/binaries/$(PLATFORM)
>>
>> (from hotspot/make/defs.make)
>>
>> We actually differ from hs16 by still using 1.5.0 rather than 1.6.0.
>> 1.5.0 implicitly seems to make more sense to me, because 1.6.0 is the
>> version being built.  But in practice, it doesn't seem to matter
>> unless you're relying on the contents of a /java tree.
>>
>
> I have a vague recollection of there being a particular reason why this was
> upgraded to 1.6.0 so I'd prefer to see this kept as 1.6.0.
>
>>> In terms of fixing the %d vs SIZE_FORMAT in vmError.cpp, I've filed
>>> 6929005
>>> "Fix format specifier in vmError.cpp."  However, I notice that the JDK 7
>>> master still has %d in this location.  I'll approve going back from %d ->
>>> SIZE_FORMAT in OpenJDK 6 conditional on the review and approval of a
>>> HotSpot
>>> engineer.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Interesting; I didn't check OpenJDK7 and indeed you're right.  Looking
>> again at the diff, it seems that we don't apply part of the same
>> changeset:
>>
>> --- ../hs16/src/share/vm/utilities/vmError.hpp  2010-01-13
>> 14:35:26.651211783 +0000
>> +++ hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities/vmError.hpp  2010-02-17
>> 11:07:40.899854566 +0000
>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>>
>>   // additional info for VM internal errors
>>   const char * _filename;
>> -  int          _lineno;
>> +  size_t       _lineno;
>>
>>   // used by fatal error handler
>>   int          _current_step;
>>
>> keeping the size_t rather than using int.  So I'll change the fix to
>> be making vmError.hpp match hs16 and OpenJDK7, rather than changing
>> vmError.cpp.
>>
>> The remaining diffs are typos and license fixups from the previous
>> merge which need to go back to the main HotSpot tree.
>>
>>
>
> If vmError.hpp matches what is in JDK 7 and HS 16, I approve your merge of
> HS 16 + Dan's fixes into OpenJDK 6.
>

Pushed.  I reused 6929005 as Fix HS16 merge issues in OpenJDK 6 to
make vmError.hpp and JDK_PREVIOUS_VERSION match hs16.  You should
probably update the bug itself to match :-)

> Thanks,
>
> -Joe
>

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8


More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list