[Fwd: URGENT code review request for Win* UnhandledExceptionFilter fix (6918421)]

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

Joe,

I think you might want this one in OpenJDK6...

> changeset:   507:0fc941df6fb7
> tag:         tip
> user:        dcubed
> date:        Tue Feb 02 10:37:32 2010 -0700
> files:       src/os/windows/vm/os_windows.cpp
> description:
> 6918421: 1/1 in-process JVM now ignores preset Windows unhandled 
> exception filter
> Summary: Add support for chaining Windows UnhandledExceptionFilter 
> handlers
> Reviewed-by: kamg, dholmes, never, acorn, ikrylov

This fix was pushed for JDK7-B83/HSX-17-B09 and JDK6_19-B03
(in one of those HSX-16.X builds that we don't talk about :-))

Let me know if you want this one in OpenJDK6 also...

Dan



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	URGENT code review request for Win* UnhandledExceptionFilter 
fix (6918421)
Date: 	Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:31:14 -0700
From: 	Daniel D. Daugherty <Daniel.Daugherty at Sun.COM>
Reply-To: 	Daniel.Daugherty at Sun.COM
To: 	hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net, 
"serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net" 
<serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>, Ivan Krylov <Ivan.Krylov at Sun.COM>



Greetings,

I have an urgent code review request for a Win* fix. Basically,
I'm making a minor tweak to Ivan's original fix for the following
bug:

   6550813 5/3 Crash because of FPU control word being modified
               by native code (win32)

Here's the URL for my tweak:

   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/6918421-webrev/0/

The fix passes the customer test attached to 6918421 and
it passes the test associated with Ivan's fix for 6550813.

I'm targeting this fix for HSX-17-B09; since this is a P1 it
will be backported to JDK6-UNN...

Thanks, in advance, for any reviews.

Dan