webrevs.2 for macosx changes to jdk7u-osx

[Henri Gomez]

Where is the Mercurial URL for jdk7u-osx ?

2011/12/2 David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>:
> <Added core-libs-dev to the cc list>
>
>
> On 2/12/2011 11:30 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
>>
>> I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams.
>> I _think_ core libs is the only one we missed, though.
>
>
> My concern is that there are a number of platform specific changes being
> made to java.* and javax.* classes (there are changes to sun.* as well but
> that is less of a concern).
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7113349/4/jdk7u-osx/modified/
>
> I would hope that we could find a way to not have to make platform specific
> changes to such classes, and we need to be sure that the proposed changes do
> not impact other platforms either in terms of functionality or performance.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>> Paul
>>
>> On 12/1/11 8:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/12/2011 7:38 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/1/11 6:12 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Kelly,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that is correct. This push is initially just for jdk7u-osx, which
>>>>> is a development forest. I'm not sure exactly what the procedure
>>>>> will be yet
>>>>> for the push into jdk7u-dev.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is no special procedure for pushing into jdk7u-osx that's
>>>> different from
>>>> the one for jdk7u-dev. You need to submit a bulk change request for
>>>> approval first,
>>>> someone (i.e. either me or Edvard) needs to approve it, then the push
>>>> can happen
>>>> - regardless whether that's jdk7u-dev or jdk7u-osx.
>>>
>>>
>>> All the osx porting work is being discussed on the macosx-port-dev
>>> mailing list. Most core-libs subscribers will not be on that list
>>> (including me - which means my cc to that list will either bounce or
>>> get held up). There are proposed changes to core Java classes that
>>> should be explicitly reviewed and approved by the core-libs folk in my
>>> opinion.
>>>
>>> David