[7u6] Request for approval for CR 7157855: jvisualvm.1 not included in binaries

[Seán Coffey]

I haven't seen any complaints from build-dev members so I would also assume
that http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/ is a suitable repo.

I'll update bug status once I see your push.

regards,
Sean.

On 22/08/2012 10:29, David Holmes wrote:
> On 22/08/2012 6:30 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> On 21/08/2012 9:37 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>> Looks fine to me but best to get an official jdk8 reviewer.
>>>
>>> Looks fine to me too.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks David.  Is there a preferred tree for me to push this to?
>
> Not from me.
>
> David
> -----
>
>>
>>>> I presume the filter-out option on macosx becomes a no-op (on
>>>> OpenJDK
>>>> builds) some lines later : (Images.gmk)
>>>>
>>>> 264 JDK_MAN_PAGES := $(filter-out jvisualvm.1, $(JDK_MAN_PAGES))
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>> On the subject of dual Makefile maintenance, are there plans to
>>>> eventually remove
>>>> the older/legacy makefile structure on 8? I haven't been monitoring
>>>> that
>>>> topic too closely.
>>>
>>> Yes. At some point "real soon now" we should make the switch to using
>>> the new build system for our official builds. Some of the work for 8
>>> is
>>> only being done in the context of the new build system.
>>>
>>
>> I need to look at moving our builds to using the new system.
>>
>>> David
>>> ----
>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Sean.
>>>>
>>>> On 21/08/2012 12:13, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>>>> Ah good catch. I didn't realise this was duplicated in the new
>>>>> build
>>>>> system.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jvisualvm/webrev.02/
>>>>>
>>>>> should deal with both cases.
>>>>>
>>>>> If this is ok, is there a preferred forest to push to? I've been
>>>>> testing against
>>>>> build, but can easily push it somewhere else.
>>>>
>>>
>>