{mailer issue} Fwd: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf) CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if BufferOverflowException thrown

[Seán Coffey]

that's  interesting. I see Alan and myself cc'ed on the mail that Tim 
sent (headers below)
It's like the mailer tweaks the mail per recipient then. Still strange!

regards,
Sean.


-------- Original Message --------
Received: 	from [10.132.188.27] (/10.132.188.27) by default (Oracle 
Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:24:12 -0700
Message-ID: 	<50463932.1030803 at oracle.com>
Date: 	Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:24:02 -0700
From: 	Tim Bell <tim.bell at oracle.com>
User-Agent: 	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 
Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 	1.0
To: 	jdk7u-dev at openjdk.java.net
CC: 	Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com>, Alan Bateman 
<Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>
Subject: 	Re: {mailer issue} Fwd: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf) 
CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if 
BufferOverflowException thrown
References: 	<5045FA2D.5050801 at oracle.com> <5045FC16.2040007 at oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: 	<5045FC16.2040007 at oracle.com>
Content-Type: 	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 	8bit




On 05/09/2012 02:14, David Holmes wrote:
>
> The email Tim sent in which he states he cc'd people, does not show 
> any cc's. I have noticed this myself when posting to multiple lists 
> and also cc'ing people - some the list mails show the cc list and 
> others do not. So I assume this is a property of each list?
>
> David
>
>> regards,
>> Sean.
>>
>> On 04/09/2012 18:24, Tim Bell wrote:
>>> Hi Seán:
>>>
>>>> On a totally unrelated note...
>>>>
>>>> I cc'ed Alan in the below email but the openJDK mailer seems to strip
>>>> out cc recipients if they're on the openJDK alias. (from what I can
>>>> make out) - This doesn't help folks who might have filters set up for
>>>> "to or cc:" fields.
>>>>
>>>> any ideas on whether this can be changed ? I'm not sure if it was
>>>> always happening. I've only seen it occur in past ~1-2 months.
>>>
>>> In Mailman terminology, this is called "nodupes -- Does the member
>>> want to avoid duplicates of the same message?"
>>>
>>> This setting is controlled by each user for each list they join.
>>> Taking the jdk7u-dev list as an example, both you and Alan have ticked
>>> the box for 'nodupes' which means you should only get one copy of my
>>> reply here, even though I explicitly added you as CC: addressees.
>>>
>>> If a list user wants to see _all_ email, they should double check
>>> their settings for the 'not metoo' and 'nodupes' options in their
>>> mailman configuration.
>>>
>>>
>>> For more information, check the GNU Mailman - List Member Manual:
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/mailman-member.html
>>>
>>> Regards-
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Sean.
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf)
>>>> CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if
>>>> BufferOverflowException thrown
>>>> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:55:09 +0100
>>>> From: Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com>
>>>> To: Neil Richards <neil.richards at ngmr.net>
>>>> CC: jdk7u-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hey Neil,
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't regard this as a risky fix and don't see a problem with it
>>>> going into jdk7u-dev now (before phase2 approval process begins in mid
>>>> September) It also benefits from having a unit testcase. Testing 
>>>> (jtreg
>>>> tests) in the jdk8/tl repos would have occurred on a regular basis 
>>>> also
>>>> since the fix was push there.
>>>>
>>>> Alan was initial reviewer and may wish to comment (cc'ed)
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Sean.
>>>>
>>>> On 04/09/2012 13:30, Neil Richards wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:58 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>>>> Approved for jdk7u-dev. (7u10)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've created a bug record for this and will mark as fixed once I see
>>>>>> your push.
>>>>>> cc'ing initial reviewer also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>> Sean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 03/09/2012 05:18, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's a request of porting the fix of 7190219 back to JDK7, could
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> please review it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7190219
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/bf0c6f91bc22
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thread where it was reviewed:
>>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-August/011087.html 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Sean,
>>>>> It looks like this changeset has not yet been promoted from the
>>>>> component (tl) forest to the master jdk8 repository.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please confirm, in light of this, if you'd like this change to be
>>>>> applied to jdk7u at this point, or if you would like it to spend some
>>>>> (more) time being proved in the jdk8 stream prior to this happening.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Neil
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>